August 16, 2007
Why Isn’t EVERYONE #1 on Google?
Setting Client Expectations for SEO

Show of hands: how many SEO professionals reading this have been asked whether they can guarantee a #1 ranking on Google?
We have. It’s a common misperception that getting a #1 ranking is a reasonable, achievable, and sustainable goal for pretty much anyone who puts their mind to it. And why wouldn’t clients assume this? There are plenty of ads promising guaranteed top rankings, usually phrased like a used-car-salesman pitch and with about as much credibility.
I mean, think about it. If these companies could always deliver what they promised, Google would need a horizontal display to accommodate the multitude of #1 rankings!
Seriously, though. When we’re asked for a guaranteed top ranking we have to respond with, “Of course that’d be great, and it’s certainly something we strive for, but we can’t absolutely promise that. And here’s why….”
Which is so much less compelling than an unqualified YES.
So if we don’t guarantee a top ranking on Google, what can we guarantee? If it’s up to us to define what clients should expect from a successful SEO campaign, what do we tell them?
A Question of Control
At times I envy my colleague Amy Konefal on the Paid Search side of our business. Compared to Search Engine Optimization, PPC is so concrete, so specific, so… controllable. It’s fast. Agile. Responsive - the Ferrari of Search. Want a top ranking? No problem, let me log in and ramp up that bid, or add some negative keywords to the Adgroup. There, try searching again. See? There we are at the top! High fives all around!
It’s really irritating.
It almost makes me happy to see Google’s Quality Score throwing a wrench into all that carefree PPC celebration.
SEO, by comparison, can seem mysterious and arbitrary to clients, a perception not diminished by unpredictable algorithm changes and Google’s often vague, delphic statements about what tactics work, what tactics could trigger an index ban, and what constitutes a quality, high-ranking web page.
So we do our best to set clear, realistic expectations up front, clarifying what’s possible and what the client will have to do to achieve it.
Great Expectations
While setting expectations is usually a custom exercise tailored to each client, here are a few of the common themes we make sure to communicate:
Expectation #1: SEO is not an exact science.
Communicating the inexact nature of SEO is an important first step. Rankings are affected by many factors, not all of which are within our or the client’s direct control. For instance:
- The SEO efforts of competitors
- changes to search engine algorithms
- a client company’s SEO-unfriendly CMS platform, directory structure, file-naming protocol, or META tagging standard that’s not going away anytime soon
- an upper-executive’s selection of keywords to target
All of these and many other uncontrollable factors influence the success of an SEO campaign.
Expectation #2: Rankings are important, but not the whole story
A narrow focus on rankings alone ignores other important considerations, ones that can make the business case for SEO much more effectively and concretely than rankings alone. For instance:
- Traffic from organic search. One of the major reasons for achieving high rankings in the first place is to increase the amount of traffic to a site. If traffic numbers increase noticeably after SEO improvements go live and maintain over time, SEO efforts can receive the credit.
- Conversions from organic search traffic. The quality of organic search traffic can be another measure of SEO’s success and value to an organization. One way to measure this is to track conversions (of whatever type your client’s site offers) from organic search traffic, and compare the quantity pre- and post-SEO efforts.
- Branding, credibility and competitive advantage. While less easy to measure directly, improved rankings (even if not the #1 spot) translate into more visibility for your client’s site and less for their competitors. Every results spot filled by a client’s page is one more chance for them to appear in front of their potential clients and customers.
Expectation #3: SEO is judged by improvement, not arbitrary targets
Moving clients away from a hard numeric goal (”We have to be #1 for ‘music’”) to one of improvement over time is key to managing an SEO project. While we may not guarantee a specific ranking, in our experience we can guarantee overall improvement in rankings, traffic, and visibility.
Expectation #4: Trends are important. Minor fluctuations are not.
Everyone’s experienced it. An optimized and link-built page finally hits the top five, only to drop three positions the next day. Panic time, right? No. Time to note the interesting little change and reassure the client.

Like a strategic stock market investor, we’re more interested in data trends than individual data points. We need a broader view than a single day’s worth of data to give quality advice. Yes, perhaps we dropped three positions today. But when we look at performance over the past month or quarter, what’s the trend? Of course, we slice and dice trends in various ways to gain as much clarity as possible. For instance, we might look at an individual page’s performance for its targeted keywords, or look at organic traffic trends for a group of strategic keywords. And of course we pay special attention to trends pre- and post-optimization efforts.
Expectation #5: Improvements depend on implementation
A caveat to Expectation #3 is this - our recommendations have to actually be implemented in order for them to work. For some clients this is no problem, but many have technical or other restrictions that limit the amount or type of tactic we are able to employ for them. So, to help set expectations in this area we set priorities, indicate which approaches would be most effective for the client, and clearly communicate the possibility of reduced results if the most effective tactics are not implemented.
Expectation #6: A ranking is more valuable if it’s for the right page
Here is an area where we differ with some SEOs, because it goes directly to visitor experience. We think a top ranking for a page that provides a poor experience isn’t much of a win because it’s not sustainable.
Visitors who click through a result listing only to find a confusing, difficult or irrelevant page aren’t likely to return. Or remember your company’s brand with affection, if at all. So what do you have to show for your top ranking but a bunch of useless, bouncing traffic? (unless, I concede, your business model is based solely on traffic numbers).
Success Through Education
We’re firm believers in SEO evangelism and education, which is why one of our service offerings is SEO training. The more a client understands about how SEO works and what factors influence success, the more they’ll spread the word and build consensus among their wider team. Which means when it comes time to change filenames, update the site directory structure, create new keyword-rich content, or get a budget approved, those involved will already be on board.
This, then, is our true long-term strategy for setting client expectations; to create educated clients who already understand what to expect.
View related topics: client expectations, google, search engine rankings, search rankings, seo, seo success









August 17th, 2007 at 7:14 am
This is a really well presented article Sandra. Of course this is a common issue to all of us. Great work!
August 17th, 2007 at 7:42 am
You can guarantee a number one ranking for long tail results. For example, by using suggestions from hittail.
August 17th, 2007 at 8:00 pm
“You can guarantee a number one ranking for long tail results. For example, by using suggestions from hittail.”
Until at least ONE other person focuses on that phrase and then you can’t guarantee anything.
Did you read the article?
If you have competition for anything in Google rankings cant be guaranteed over any period of time.
Nice read.
August 18th, 2007 at 8:31 pm
I see a lot of truth in this. Guaranteeing a #1 spot seems downright unreasonable.
August 19th, 2007 at 9:49 pm
Perfect, was looking for something just like this to email to friends.
August 20th, 2007 at 6:08 am
Well then, aim for the invisible long tail.
August 20th, 2007 at 8:51 am
While I agree the article is well-written, and the points have been accepted as truth in mainstream SEO for years, I disagree with some points.
For example, Hobo says to Justin’s point: “Until at least ONE other person focuses on that phrase and then you can’t guarantee anything.”
Oh, but you can. HitTail suggestions are uniquely keyed to the website for which they were issued. Two equivalent websites do not have the same ability to rocket to position #1 given the same suggestion. The suggestion was issued precisely BECAUSE the site showed the latent potential to seize the number one position on that term. A competitor that’s shadowing you, stealing your keywords, is going to be pretty frustrated.
But the points go on. I won’t go too deep here–I might write a follow-on article. But in brief, “Expectation #1: SEO is not an exact science.”
…uh, I bet to differ. While the results of SEO may vary based on an enormous number of difficult-to-know variables, it is in-fact a science. And while results may not be precisely exact, they are about as predictable as anything else that science tells us is difficult to predict (the weather). Simulations can indeed tell you where things are going, and in the short-term, those predictions can be fairly accurate.
We’ve been doing it for years, and every time I mention it to Google folks (which I do often), they contemplate a few moments, and then say (more or less), “That’s an OK method. That’s still in the correct spirit of Google.”
August 20th, 2007 at 11:57 am
Or go read some blog/media mentions of hittail here: http://hittail.typepad.com/
or google for ‘hittail results’
August 21st, 2007 at 5:01 am
[…] coincidence, Sandra Niehaus has just published a related post entitled, Why Isn’t EVERYONE #1 on Google? She wrote it for all those SEO professionals who have been asked whether they can guarantee a #1 […]
August 21st, 2007 at 8:13 am
Excellent post - very informative specially for dealing with clients - keep it up.
August 21st, 2007 at 8:34 am
[…] Setting client expectations for search engine ranikings and SEO success, Closed Loop Marketing […]
August 21st, 2007 at 10:14 am
Thanks for the good debate, everyone!
One point of clarification: By saying SEO is ‘not an exact science’ I didn’t mean to imply we can’t make fairly decent predictions. But being ‘fairly accurate’ is a far cry from being truly exact. Just ask any engineer whether a measurement that’s ‘pretty close’ is good enough for his calculations… (Sorry, it’s my dad’s influence coming through, here.)
But I think we’re basically in agreement.
August 21st, 2007 at 10:14 am
Excellent post. As it happens, I read it on the day a prospect was trying to convince me that all he needed was to get his website back from #3 up to #1 again. It’s dropped in the last 12 months and sales have dropped about 20% too. Another case of client expectations for SEO and from what I could see the answer was much more complicated than that. So I blogged on this post and on this prospect in a post entitled, Google Rankings Drive Sales - SEO Expectations.
August 21st, 2007 at 3:01 pm
Expectations won’t change until SEO’s stop guaranteeing rankings.
August 21st, 2007 at 5:33 pm
This was a great post! Another big problem that tends to surface as an agency grows, is trying to keep sales staff in check so they don’t build up or fuel unreasonable customer expectations. There’s always a battle in every organization between sales staff and those that actually ‘do the work’, but the mysterious world of Internet Marketing can really inspire some outrageous client expectations, especially when led astray by an eager salesperson…
August 21st, 2007 at 9:58 pm
Thanks for writing on a subject that I believe can use a lot more coverage: client expectations. I believe that most of the unhappiness on both sides of the consulting fence is created by communication misunderstandings.
Although it may appear that PPC is so much easier than SEO we actually have very similar issues. Clients don’t really understand what we do and what we can and cannot control. And while there was a time when we could control position fairly well that time is pretty much in the past now.
Try getting clients to understand that their ads really are in great positions even though when THEY search on their keywords their ads aren’t even on the first page of results. (True story.)
Or that it is pretty easy to either lower their cost per conversion OR to increase their sales - the trick is to find an optimum middle ground between the two. (They are related but few understand how.)
August 22nd, 2007 at 9:50 am
Brian, as I mentioned on Sphinn it can also be management that sets the tone for Sales, prioritizing the quick buck.
Rose, thanks for that. I agree client communications are crucial to successful projects. Our PPC director, Amy Konefal, may be up for writing a post on managing client’s PPC expectations, I’ll run it by her.
August 31st, 2007 at 9:25 am
Enjoyed your post and your writing style, found you from Sphinn. Looking forward to the artilce on managing client’s PPC expectations.